All Articles
D
dev@snm.co.za
Commentary · May 2026
Every Sunday, in churches across every continent, billions of people sing praise to Jesus, pray to Jesus, and declare Jesus to be their Lord and Saviour. Entire worship services are built around glorifying his name. Denominations have fought - and in some cases killed - over the correct way to honour him. Christianity, the world's largest religion, is built upon the centrality of Jesus as the object of worship.
There is just one problem. Jesus said, in his own words, that he did not want any of it.
This is not a fringe interpretation. It is not found in a Gnostic text excluded from the bible or in a disputed historical document. It is written plainly in the canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - the very same scriptures upon which Christianity rests. Read carefully, they tell a story that is quite different from what most people have been taught.
What Jesus Actually Said About Worship and Honour
Consider the following passages, each recorded in the canonical Gospels, each spoken by Jesus himsel
"I receive not honour from men."
John 5:41
The statement is unambiguous. Jesus was not being modest. He was making a clear declaration: human honour directed at him personally was not something he sought, accepted, or required. He went further.
"And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, God."
Mark 10:18
When a man approached Jesus and called him "Good Master," Jesus immediately redirected the compliment away from himself and toward God. Not toward himself as God, but away from himself entirely. The distinction is deliberate and striking - particularly given that mainstream Christianity teaches that Jesus is God.
"And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth."
John 8:50
Again, Jesus disavows personal glory. He is not the seeker of worship in this picture - he is the messenger. The glory, he makes clear, belongs to another.
Then there is perhaps the most confronting passage of all, found in the Sermon on the Mount:
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
Matthew 7:21–23
This is extraordinary. Jesus is not describing pagans or atheists. He is describing people who have spent their lives prophesying in his name, performing miracles in his name, and doing "wonderful works" in his name - the very activities that define much of mainstream Christian practice. And his response to them is: I never knew you.
"The test Jesus applied was not worship of him. It was living by the Word of God - the message he came to deliver."
A Linguistic Key: "On Him" vs. "In Him"
One of the most significant and least understood distinctions in the Gospels is the difference between two prepositions that appear almost identical in translation but carry entirely different meanings in the original Greek.
When Jesus spoke of belief, he consistently used the phrase "believeth on him" - not "believeth in him." In modern English this seems like a minor stylistic variation. In the Greek of the original text, it is a fundamental distinction.
The Greek preposition used in these passages is eis - meaning "into, toward, concerning, for the purpose of." It denotes direction toward something, a goal or a purpose. It is not the preposition you would use to express devotion to a person.
When Jesus said "he that believeth on him" in John 3:16 and across the Gospels, the "him" referred to concerns the message, the authority, and the purpose of Jesus - not Jesus as a person to be personally adored. The Greek makes this clear, even when English translations obscure it.
Compare this to the phrase "believe in him" - the expression of personal devotion, as in believing in someone as a person, trusting them, adoring them. This is the framing that centuries of Christian teaching have applied to Jesus. But it is not, linguistically, what the original texts say.
Similarly, in John 3:18, when Jesus says those who do not believe "in the name of the only begotten Son of God" will be condemned, the word "name" in the original Greek refers to authority and character - not a personal title to be invoked. To believe "in the name of" means to align with the authority, the character, and the message - not to worship the person who carried it.
This is not a minor textual footnote. It reframes the entire basis of Christian worship.
How Worship of Jesus Became Christianity's Foundation
If Jesus was so explicit about not seeking personal honour, how did a religion built almost entirely on his personal worship come to dominate the world?
The answer begins not with theology but with politics. In the Gospel of John, Chapter 11, a crucial scene unfolds. Jesus had been attracting large followings. His teachings were pulling people away from the synagogues and away from the authority of the chief priests and Pharisees. The religious establishment was alarmed - not for spiritual reasons, but for political ones.
"If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation."
John 11:48
Their concern was explicit: the influence of Jesus threatened their position of power within the Roman system. What followed was a calculated plan. Caiaphas, the high priest, proposed that it was better for one man to die than for the whole nation to be destabilised. Jesus was arrested, tortured, and crucified.
To absolve themselves of responsibility for this killing - and to prevent an uprising from Jesus' followers - the narrative was reframed. The crucifixion, which had been a politically motivated murder, was presented as a divine sacrifice. Jesus had died for the people. God had planned it all along. The cross became not a symbol of state violence but of salvation.
This reframing served institutional religion extraordinarily well. If the crucifixion was God's plan, then those who carried it out were instruments of divine will rather than murderers protecting their political power. And if Jesus died as a sacrifice for sin, then the relationship between the believer and God now ran through Jesus - and through the institutions that claimed to represent him. Personal access to God, of the kind Jesus had spent his ministry describing, was replaced by mediated access through the church.
The worship of Jesus - which Jesus himself had explicitly rejected - became the cornerstone of an institutional system that has endured for two millennia.
What Jesus Actually Asked For
Removed from the framework of institutional religion, the message Jesus taught is simpler and more direct than most people have been led to believe.
He asked people to live by the Word of God - the divine expression he had been entrusted to deliver. He asked them to love God with all their heart, soul, and mind, and to love their neighbours as themselves. He promised that after his departure, a Comforter - the Spirit of truth - would come to guide each person individually and personally, without the need for any intermediary.
"Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you."
John 16:7
This is a remarkable statement that receives far less attention than it deserves. Jesus is saying that his departure is not a tragedy - it is a necessary step so that something better can arrive. The Comforter, the Spirit of truth, will guide each person personally. Not through a church. Not through a priest. Not through rituals performed in his name. Personally, directly, and individually.
And in John 16:23, Jesus makes another statement that almost never appears in Sunday sermons: "In that day ye shall ask me nothing." After his departure, Jesus says, he is no longer the point of contact. The Comforter has taken that role.
The message Jesus brought was never about himself. It was never about his name, his image, his cross, or centuries of devotion directed at his person. It was about the Word of God - a living, universal, spiritual truth available to every person directly, without mediation.
"The Comforter guides each person personally. No church, no priest, no institution required. Jesus said so himself."
The contradiction at the heart of Christian worship is not a new discovery. The evidence has always been there, in the canonical Gospels, in the words Jesus spoke. What has prevented most people from seeing it is not a lack of access to the text - it is the way the text has been interpreted, controlled, and presented by institutions with a vested interest in maintaining their own authority.
Two billion people worship a man who, in his own recorded words, said he did not want to be worshipped. The Gospel truth has always been hiding in plain sight.
